I doubt they would really care. Ordering 100 server would probably be heavily delayed though, since they’ve been struggling to meet demand for a while now. You would be better off emailing their sales department directly.
Not sure for what you need that kind of bandwidth, however, to pull off 100Gbps of one server with only SSDs and not even an NVMe cache is not an easy task.
@vovler Well the disks won’t even be used only ram caching will be used but now that you say it it’s true that I will need to test it out if I want to make it work.
I just saw they also offer VPS with 10 Gbps at 220$ which looks really pretty decent, since I don’t need a lot of CPU power nor SSD.
Thanks for all your answers and for helping me out as always and taking me seriously too, because I saw a few posts on LET but everyone was joking about it.
And the other issue I could have pulled 100 Gbps is for testing I would need another 100 Gbps server because theoretical limits are always easy to calculate but real limits are always something else.
Now seriously… Why would you need 100Gbps? Dont think you’re DoSing someong, for Plex you’d need a decent CPU so its not that… so is it live streaming with high number of concurrent viewers?
DataPacket can do large ports with smaller commits, they can also agg across multiple locations.
FDC can do something similar.
With that said, I’ll reiterate the question - what do you need such large ports for? It’s not easy to generate 100G traffic, you need quite a bit of processing power and clever system tuning.
What sort of software are you using? Anything using XDP or DPDK, or just plain old sockets?